Histories of Psychoanalysis is committed to facilitating the exploration of the variegated history of psychoanalysis especially (though by no means exclusively) within the English-speaking world. Histories of Psychoanalysis is also a growing repository of resources: from listings of archives, through short biographies of both known and now largely forgotten figures in psychoanalytic history and its pre-histories (including, in some cases, the digitised archiving of primary source materials). This site also includes bibliographies, writings, and a blog, and will offer those new to the area as well as more established participants a developing patchwork to assist further studies.
Psychoanalysis is here understood as a particular tripartite body of knowledge of the mind, a disciplinary and interdisciplinary research activity, and a method for treating psychological problems filtered through the work of Freud and others (note). Here we include figures and movements within the pre-history of psychoanalysis (such as Charcot, Bernheim and The Society for Psychical Research) as well as those Martin Bergmann might term dissidents of one form or another (such as Jung, Adler, Rank, Ferenczi, Horney, Klein, Fairbairn, etc) (note). The history of psychoanalysis, like psychoanalysis itself, has been a controversial and contested area. From Freud's Die Traumdeutung (note) to his 1914 paper 'On the history of the psychoanalytic movement' (note), through the anonymous 1920 'History of the British Psycho-Analytical Society' (note), to Ernest Jones's 'authorised' biography of Freud (note), early contributions to the field were often partial, politicised, and tending towards the hagiographical.
We might say they represented types of family romance or - as Erich Fromm once provocatively (and with some hyperbole) suggested - 'Stalinist histories', rewritten to support the prevailing party line (note). It was perhaps against this background that Alain de Mijolla, the well-known historian of psychoanalysis, said that psychoanalysts could seem uninterested in psychoanalytic history (note). It would indeed be ironic if this were the case, given the supposed interest psychoanalysis has in case histories and the depictions of clinical psychoanalysis as extended history taking (note). Such early received narratives have, however, from the 1950s onwards, been contested, revised, elaborated, and augmented in multiple ways by many contributors, leading to a far livelier interest in the histories of psychoanalysis.
Histories of Psychoanalysis, through its editors and contributors, host and curate a widening range of work in this field. Visitors are invited to browse and make use of the growing collections of material and resources here. We welcome further contributions to the histories of psychoanalysis collections from others. Do make contact.
The site is a work in progress and is constantly being developed and updated. If you would like email notification when new material is posted, These will not be traded or used by us for any other purposes and you can automatically unsubscribe at any time (see also our privacy policy).
Subscribe to receive notifications of new material
The information provided will be processed in accordance with our privacy policy